The Difference Between Wrongful Death and Survival Actions

June 24, 2023


Greetings, esteemed readers! In our ongoing endeavor to expand your legal repertoire, today's post will explore the intricate yet indispensable sphere of wrongful death and survival actions. While both concepts dwell within the realm of civil litigation related to the demise of a loved one, each has its own distinct legal nuances and implications that must be understood.

As a society that values justice and fairness, we place great emphasis on the legal remedies available to those who have suffered an irreplaceable loss. Wrongful death and survival actions are the linchpins of this endeavor, ensuring that the deceased's family and estate receive the recompense they deserve.

The Genesis of Wrongful Death and Survival Actions

The common law doctrines that form the foundation of our legal system did not initially recognize wrongful death or survival actions. This lacuna was filled by the advent of statutory law that created these causes of action, offering a remedy to families left devastated by the sudden demise of a loved one due to another's negligence.

Wrongful Death Actions: The Quintessence

A wrongful death action is a legal claim that arises when a person's death is caused by the negligent, reckless, or intentional act of another. The crux of this claim lies in the notion that the survivors of the deceased deserve compensation for their losses incurred as a result of the untimely death.

This type of action is typically brought forth by the personal representative of the deceased's estate on behalf of the surviving family members. Damages awarded in a wrongful death suit may include, but are not limited to:

  • Loss of financial support
  • Loss of companionship, guidance, and emotional support
  • Medical and funeral expenses

The economic theory of compensatory damages underscores the relevance of wrongful death actions, as the family members may find themselves grappling with unforeseen financial hardships in the absence of the deceased's support. The principle of loss aversion further bolsters this argument, as individuals tend to experience a greater sense of loss than satisfaction when faced with equivalent gains or losses.

Survival Actions: An Ode to the Deceased

While wrongful death actions seek to compensate the surviving family members for their losses, survival actions strive to redress the economic and non-economic harms suffered by the deceased prior to their death. Essentially, this type of action operates under the premise that had the deceased survived, they would have been able to bring forth a personal injury claim for the harm they endured.

Survival actions are commonly brought forth by the personal representative of the deceased's estate, and any damages awarded become part of the estate. The range of damages recoverable in survival actions may include:

  • Conscious pain and suffering experienced by the deceased
  • Lost wages from the time of injury until death
  • Medical expenses incurred prior to death

The law of diminishing marginal utility provides a solid rationale for survival actions, as the deceased's estate may face mounting expenses with diminishing resources. Survival actions ensure that the estate is not left crippled by these costs, allowing for a more equitable distribution of assets among the beneficiaries.

The Intersection of Wrongful Death and Survival Actions

While wrongful death and survival actions are distinct legal claims, they often intersect when it comes to the apportionment of damages. Courts may employ various methods, such as the "bifurcation" or the "unitary" approach, to allocate damages between the two types of actions.

The bifurcation approach involves separating the trial into two distinct phases – one for wrongful death damages and the other for survival damages. This method is preferred when the damages are easily distinguishable and ensures a more precise allocation.

On the other hand, the unitary approach entails a single trial where the court assesses the damages collectively and apportions them between the wrongful death and survival actions. This method is favored when the damages are intertwined and difficult to parse out.

In navigating the labyrinth of wrongful death and survival actions, an astute awareness of these legal nuances is vital. As we bid adieu to this intellectual sojourn, remember that a firm grasp of the intricacies involved in these actionscan make all the difference in securing justice and fair compensation for the bereaved family and the deceased's estate. Armed with this knowledge, you are now better equipped to traverse the complex landscape of wrongful death and survival actions in the pursuit of justice.

Related Questions

What is the main difference between wrongful death and survival actions?

The main difference between wrongful death and survival actions is that wrongful death actions seek to compensate the surviving family members for their losses, while survival actions strive to redress the economic and non-economic harms suffered by the deceased prior to their death.

Who can bring forth a wrongful death action?

A wrongful death action is typically brought forth by the personal representative of the deceased's estate on behalf of the surviving family members.

What types of damages can be awarded in a wrongful death suit?

Damages awarded in a wrongful death suit may include loss of financial support, loss of companionship, guidance, and emotional support, and medical and funeral expenses.

Who can bring forth a survival action?

Survival actions are commonly brought forth by the personal representative of the deceased's estate.

What types of damages can be awarded in a survival action?

Damages recoverable in survival actions may include conscious pain and suffering experienced by the deceased, lost wages from the time of injury until death, and medical expenses incurred prior to death.

What are the bifurcation and unitary approaches in allocating damages between wrongful death and survival actions?

The bifurcation approach involves separating the trial into two distinct phases – one for wrongful death damages and the other for survival damages. The unitary approach entails a single trial where the court assesses the damages collectively and apportions them between the wrongful death and survival actions.

Why did common law not initially recognize wrongful death or survival actions?

Common law did not initially recognize wrongful death or survival actions because they were not part of the traditional legal doctrines. These causes of action were later created by statutory law to offer a remedy to families left devastated by the sudden demise of a loved one due to another's negligence.

Interested in the Best Wrongful Death Lawyers?

If you're looking to learn more about wrongful death lawyers, our blog posts are a great place to start. For an even deeper dive into the topic, check out our rankings of Best Wrongful Death Lawyers in America.

Alex Wilson | Dan Moore | Alex Johnson